.NET developers have been in the transition to move from synchronous APIs to asynchronous API. That was boosted a lot by await/async keyword of C# 5.0, but we are now in a dangerous middle ground: there are as many synchronous APIs as there are async ones. The mix of them requires the ability to call async APIs from a synchronous context, and vice versa. Calling synchronous APIs from an async context is simple – you can fire up a task and let it does the work. Calling async APIs from a sync context is much more complicated. And that is where AsyncHelper comes to the play.
AsyncHelper is a common thing used to run async code in a synchronous context. It is simple helper class with two methods to run async APIs
public static TResult RunSync<TResult>(Func<Task<TResult>> func)
{
var cultureUi = CultureInfo.CurrentUICulture;
var culture = CultureInfo.CurrentCulture;
return _myTaskFactory.StartNew(() =>
{
Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = culture;
Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentUICulture = cultureUi;
return func();
}).Unwrap().GetAwaiter().GetResult();
}
public static void RunSync(Func<Task> func)
{
var cultureUi = CultureInfo.CurrentUICulture;
var culture = CultureInfo.CurrentCulture;
_myTaskFactory.StartNew(() =>
{
Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = culture;
Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentUICulture = cultureUi;
return func();
}).Unwrap().GetAwaiter().GetResult();
}There are slight variants of it, with and without setting the CurrentCulture and CurrentUICulture, but the main part is still spawning a new Task to run the async task, then blocks and gets the result using Unwrap().GetAwaiter().GetResult();
One of the reason it was so popular was people think it was written by Microsoft so it must be safe to use, but it is actually not true: the class is introduced as an internal class by AspNetIdentity AspNetIdentity/src/Microsoft.AspNet.Identity.Core/AsyncHelper.cs at main · aspnet/AspNetIdentity (github.com) .That means Microsoft teams can use it when they think it’s the right choice to do, it’s not the default recommendation to run async tasks in a synchronous context.
Unfortunately I’ve seen a fair share of threads stuck in AsyncHelper.RunSync stacktrace, likely have fallen victims of a deadlock situation.
756A477F9790 75ABD117CF16 [HelperMethodFrame_1OBJ] (System.Threading.Monitor.ObjWait)
756A477F98C0 75AB62F11BF9 System.Threading.ManualResetEventSlim.Wait(Int32, System.Threading.CancellationToken)
756A477F9970 75AB671E0529 System.Threading.Tasks.Task.SpinThenBlockingWait(Int32, System.Threading.CancellationToken)
756A477F99D0 75AB671E0060 System.Threading.Tasks.Task.InternalWaitCore(Int32, System.Threading.CancellationToken)
756A477F9A40 75AB676068B8 System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(System.Threading.Tasks.Task, System.Threading.Tasks.ConfigureAwaitOptions)
756A477F9A60 75AB661E4FE7 System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter`1[[System.__Canon, System.Private.CoreLib]].GetResult()An further explanation of why this is bad can be read here
c# – Is Task.Result the same as .GetAwaiter.GetResult()? – Stack Overflow
Async/sync is a complex topic and even experienced developers make mistake. There is no simple way to just run async code in a sync context. AsyncHelper is absolutely not. It is simple, convenient way, but does not guarantee to be correct thing in your use case. I see it as a shortcut to solve some problems but create bigger ones down the path.
Just because you can. doesn’t mean you should. That applies to AsyncHelper perfectly